As a game master, I traditionally steered clear of heavy use of chance during my Dungeons & Dragons sessions. I preferred was for story direction and session development to be guided by player choice instead of the roll of a die. However, I decided to change my approach, and I'm very happy with the result.
A popular streamed game features a DM who frequently asks for "chance rolls" from the adventurers. He does this by choosing a specific dice and defining possible results tied to the result. While it's at its core no distinct from using a pre-generated chart, these get invented in the moment when a character's decision lacks a obvious outcome.
I opted to test this method at my own session, primarily because it looked interesting and offered a break from my standard routine. The results were eye-opening, prompting me to reflect on the often-debated dynamic between pre-determination and randomization in a roleplaying game.
During one session, my group had survived a large-scale fight. Later, a player asked about two key NPCs—a brother and sister—had lived. Instead of picking a fate, I handed it over to chance. I asked the player to make a twenty-sided die roll. The stakes were: on a 1-4, both died; a middling roll, a single one would die; on a 10+, they made it.
The player rolled a 4. This resulted in a deeply moving sequence where the party found the bodies of their allies, forever clasped together in their final moments. The party held a ceremony, which was uniquely meaningful due to earlier character interactions. As a parting gesture, I decided that the remains were strangely restored, revealing a spell-storing object. I randomized, the bead's magical effect was precisely what the group needed to address another pressing quest obstacle. One just script such serendipitous moments.
This event made me wonder if chance and spontaneity are truly the core of D&D. Although you are a meticulously planning DM, your skill to pivot can rust. Groups frequently excel at derailing the most carefully laid plots. Therefore, a effective DM needs to be able to think quickly and create details on the fly.
Utilizing on-the-spot randomization is a great way to practice these talents without straying too much outside your comfort zone. The trick is to apply them for minor decisions that won't drastically alter the campaign's main plot. To illustrate, I would not employ it to decide if the main villain is a traitor. Instead, I might use it to decide if the characters arrive right after a key action occurs.
Luck rolls also serves to maintain tension and foster the sensation that the game world is responsive, progressing based on their decisions in real-time. It combats the sense that they are merely pawns in a pre-written script, thereby bolstering the cooperative foundation of storytelling.
This philosophy has always been integral to the original design. Early editions were enamored with charts, which fit a playstyle focused on treasure hunting. While current D&D often focuses on plot-driven play, leading many DMs to feel they must prep extensively, that may not be the best approach.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with thorough preparation. However, there is also no issue with stepping back and allowing the whim of chance to determine certain outcomes rather than you. Control is a significant factor in a DM's job. We use it to run the game, yet we can be reluctant to give some up, even when doing so can lead to great moments.
My final suggestion is this: Don't be afraid of letting go of control. Try a little improvisation for minor story elements. It may discover that the organic story beat is significantly more memorable than anything you might have planned in advance.
A passionate writer and lifestyle enthusiast with a background in digital media, sharing practical advice and personal experiences.